25 Dec |
Little Miss Paige Responds…in Little Miss Paige, cry us a fucking river, just sayin, suicides, unretouched |
Browsing in unretouched
In late November, we posted an article with a simple critique about Lil Miss Paige. We pointed out that she may have let go of herself a bit while nurturing her newly founded business. She followed through with a video response which was posted on her profile. She admits in the video that she doesn’t ‘give a fuck’ affirming our critique. She lays it on pretty thick claiming posts like that are contributing to things like the recent webcast suicide that had happened a few days before her post was published. We are pure as the wind-driven snow… and contributing to no such thing as webcam suicides. How dare she?! If anything, we are fighting to distract those who would have self destructive thoughts! We deserve a fucking Nobel peace prize bitch! jk. But she does look great in the video. In the interest of fairness and hearing both sides, we thought we would share it. Oh and Merry Xmas! 23 comments
Once one of the most beautiful and well known girls on Stickam, Little miss Paige has been focusing on her business side with her new project “Young Muscle Magazine“. We are all for young women to step it up and take over the world, but is letting go of one’s appearance necessary? At least spending hours on Stickam, made her care about her looks a bit more. We have a solution! Paige should go Live, at least once a week. If not to make us happy, than at least to help in some way bring back the Paige whom ladies and faggots adored and made straight boys feverishly fap. http://www.stickam.com/littlemisspaige
StickyDrama can be somewhat stubborn. It would doubtless bring us more traffic if we focused our gossip-mongering on the banal press releases of real celebrities, instead of the outrageous follies of nobodies. For example, we don’t find anything particularly lulzy in the so-called “racy” photos hacked (or should we say leaked) from Miley Cyrus; but we take exquisite delight in Audiowh0regam’s response to whoever Photoshopped her previously released n00dz.
As of this post, the pseudo-n00dz are still linked on her own Myspace profile—below the Stickam gif in her General interests. Meanwhile on her Stickam profile, she has a new song about the latest Miley Cyrus hack. Is Audio the next Weird Al Yankovic?
Ever since there was film, the media has had an “It Girl,” a young girl with sex appeal whose vacuous life was obsessively followed by the public. Not clever, not articulate, not particularly talented—but she knew the right people in that sleazy pit known as Hollywood, and worked with photographers who had her show just the right amount of skin. This distinctively modern phenomenon began with silent film star Clara Bow. The crown has since been passed along to numerous bimbos, from Marlyn Monroe to the more recent Paris Hilton. And now, it seems, to Miss Hanna Beth. In contrast to top-ranked female Entertainers Kiki Kannibal and Audrey Kitching, who provoke streams of negative comments and insults, StickyDrama has observed that viewers in Hanna’s Live are relatively supportive. All the more reason to post unflattering, unretouched photos of her. An occasional dose of ugly reality is a healthy thing for the thousands of teens who think these “it girls” enjoy carefree lives as modern princesses. In particular, we hope Hanna’s fans wonder what troubling thoughts lurked in her mind as she sliced through her own flesh in the third photo. That image of her resembles much-hyped pictures of Lindsay Lohan, in which she and a friend rubbed knives across the actress’s body. Cutting one’s skin to distract from the unbearable pain of existence is a sign that money spent at the salon would be better spent at the psychatrist’s office. It’s not all hair extensions and fun, kids!
“Flowers,” John Ruskin wrote in the Victorian Age, “seem intended for the solace of ordinary humanity.” How sophisticated our aesthetics have evolved, over a century later in the Digital Age, when nothing raises our spirits like unretouched photos of the so-called beautiful people. For our part StickyDrama can scarcely imagine the profoundly uplifting effect on the masses triggered by this most unflattering image of Raquel Reed, who apparently was photographed in the midst of removing her many coats of makeup.
For those readers unfamiliar with popular Myspace personalities, Raquel is a professional makeup artist who has made somewhat of a name for herself online as an aspiring model. Her onstage appearance at Bamboozle confirmed she was once again part of the exclusive Jeffree Star-Chris Crocker clique, comprised of faggots and bimbos famous for doing nothing in particular. Many StickyDrama readers were quick to notice that the Audiowh0rgasm seen during SXSW was somewhat different-looking than the Audiowh0rgasm familiar to Stickam. The mystery is sure to be revived, now that two new, vastly different n00dz of the Entertainer have been released.
The above photo was released in reaction to another, much more slender photo that was also sent to StickyDrama, by yet another anonymous angel. The photo below has been passed around all day long, and struck many as false: Truth be told, StickyDrama is not very impressed by the slender version. While its retouching is convincingly photorealistic, the Audio depicted therein strikes us as an Ethiopian runway model, simply too thin to be believed. And too unhealthy to be desirable. On the other hand, whereas the untrained eye is quick to take the plumper belly for the real one, StickyDrama actually suspects MORE Photoshop in the supposedly “unretouched” photo. Real photos, especially low-quality digital ones, have “digital noise” or “grain” … little specks that pepper the entire image. We could not help but notice how the rotund Audio’s belly is very smooth—a clear indication of amateur retouching. So where does reality lie? Probably somewhere inbetween. Rather than come down definitively one way or the other, we post both photos and allow our readers to debate their authenticity. In order to maximize the exposure of these photos, which as n00dz go aren’t very scandalous, we have decided to cover her left nipple and post them on our main page. May the vicious comments begin!
Ryan Andrew recently sent StickyDrama an unretouched photo of popular Myspace cutie Alex Evans, who won our first Eye Candy contest.
Quoting Ryan: “The picture of him unphotoshopped is pretty bad. It’s not horrible, but not as good as the pictures he has up on MySpace. You can see that he uses foundation that’s too dark for his skin, his eyes aren’t as blue in real life, his chin and jawline seem pretty messed up, his eyebrows need a ton of work, etc. I’m sure a lot of obsessed girls would be somewhat surprised if they saw that photo of him, since everyone knows him as the ocean blue eyed pretty boy.” Granted, Alex isn’t that bad au naturel; and he probably didn’t even know what the fuck StickyDrama is, let alone that he was in our Eye Candy gallery. Nevertheless we are distressed that Photoshop was probably the only reason he managed to beat the naturally suckable Dennis Hegstad—and only by a slight margin. Dennis, who appears on cam in various degrees of undress and intoxication, was StickyDrama’s favorite to win. We’ll take Dennis “raw” (so to speak) over a retouched Alex anytime. | |||||||||
|
|